greg bahnsen debate

Dr. Greg Bahnsen and Dr. Gordon Stein debated this question at the University of This debate has influenced a large number of people. This is the famous formal debate between Dr. Bahnsen and atheist promoter Dr. Gordon Stein held at the university of California (Irvine) in Hear how hard. Dr. Bahnsen took the view that Luke 17:22–37 refers to the Second Coming while Matthew 24:1–34 refers to the judgment on Jerusalem that took place before that first-century generation passed away (24:34).

This statement holds true both for Bahnsen’s written scholarly work as well as his practical applications in both formal and informal debates and exchanges. A post on the Always Ready Facebook page has an interesting discussion on Luke 17 and its relationship to Matthew 24–25 and Greg L. Bahnsen’s view of that relationship. You will also find what must, by … Still the Gold Standard: Dr. Greg Bahnsen in Debate. It’s exactly what … The full list of conference speakers and topics with one of the best collections of scholars ever brought to bear upon the subject. Bahnsen earned a B.A. What follows are chronicles and supporting documents compiled by Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen during and immediately after his unfortunate and groundless termination at Reformed Theological Seminary (RTS), Jackson, MS, in 1978-79. Bahnsen Lectures from CMF - via Podcast Addict | Bahnsen Lectures Bahnsen: ‘The assumption of God is the precondition of knowledge.’ Van Til – within one paragraph he switches from ‘the presupposition of the truth of Christianity is the precondition of knowledge’ to ‘the truth of Christianity is the precondition of knowledge.’ Well, the latter I wouldn’t disagree with. Bahnsen followed the lead of his mentor Cornelius Van Til and reasoned that, apart from the Christian faith, the unbeliever cannot account for his knowledge. I tell my students that one of the glories of the reformed faith is … Greg Bahnsen (1948-1995) was the scholar in residence at The Southern California Center for Christian Studies where he taught Apologetics from a distinctly Reformed perspective. Greg Bahnsen. "What of Christ and Culture?" Dr Richard Dewitt: The fact that so many are here this evening is an indication of some at least some degree of interest (audience laughing) in the subject matter to be handled. A new conference at Branch of Hope OPC! (1977) (For my review of this debate see Bahnsen vs Sproul - God or Absurdity Blog ). Those knowledgeable of Van Til’s “Copernican Revolution” in […] Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen (1948–1995) provided perhaps the clearest, most faithful, and most powerful advancement of Cornelius Van Til’s presuppositional apologetics of anyone. You will find that common rumors, assumptions, and even recent publications (more on this soon) are demolished by the material collected here. They debated the question “Is Faith In God Reasonable?” I appreciated Jon’s post and hope only to add my perspective to several of his points … Bahnsen Sproul Debate Full Transcript R.C Sproul and Greg Bahnsen Debate. Ken Gentry … Greg L. Bahnsen (September 17, – December 11, ) was an American Calvinist The debate with Stein … My friend Jon Sturm published a great guest article on the debate between an atheist, Alex Rosenberg, and a Christian, William Lane Craig, at Purdue University last week (video of the full debate here). This particular nuanced debate came out in RC Sproul’s debate with Bahnsen. in Philosophy from … Thursday Evening October 22nd: “Understanding and Debating Atheism” (a live debate)- Sye TenBruggencate, (Absolute Apologetics) …